Second Amendment cases moving through the courts today will establish the parameters of the right to keep and bear arms for future generations. The Second Amendment Law Center is now at the front lines of those historic battles in states across the country. Below is a list of the lawsuits in which the 2ALC legal team has filed amicus briefs on behalf of various strategic partners who support 2ALC’s mission.

Case Name: United States of America v. Gabriel Cowan Metcalf

Case Number: 24-4818

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Date Filed: 12/6/2024

Document Description: Brief of Amici Curiae California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated, Second Amendment Law Center, Inc., Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus The Second Amendment Foundation, Second Amendment Defense and Education Coalition, LTD., and Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, in Support of Appellant and Reversal

Case Name: Garry Matthews v. City of Los Angeles

Case Number: 23-3874

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Date Filed: 10/16/2024

Document Description: Brief of Amici Curiae California Rifle & Pistol Association, Second Amendment Law Center, Inc., Second Amendment Foundation, and Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus in Support of Appellant and Reversal

Description: This case concerns three Plaintiffs who are suing Los Angeles over what they allege are unconstitutional arrests for carrying a firearm without a permit, as the arrests happened before Bruen when the City was not issuing permits to regular citizens. As one of the Plaintiffs is a nonresident from Tennessee, our brief focused on the lack of any historical tradition to support requiring nonresidents to get a CCW permit from California before carrying in the state.

Case Name: David Snope v. Anthony Brown, Attorney General of Maryland

Case Number: 24-203

Court: United States Supreme Court

Date Filed: 9/23/2024

Document Description: Brief of Amicus Curiae Second Amendment Law Center, Inc., California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated, Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, Inc., Second Amendment Defense and Education Coalition, LTD., Operation Blazing Sword-Pink Pistols, and Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus in Support of Petitioners

Description: Challenge to Maryland “Assault Weapon” Ban. Our amicus brief argued in support of Petitioners and for reversal of the Fourth Circuit’s En Banc ruling upholding Maryland’s ban on common rifles, pointing out that the Second Amendment has traditionally protected bearable arms commonly used by the military as well, so long as they are not only used by the military.

 

Case Name: United States of America v. Ayala

Case Number: 24-10462

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Date Filed: 9/23/2024

Document Description: Amicus Brief of Amici Curiae California Rifle & Pistol Association, Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, Second Amendment Law Center, Inc, and the Second Amendment Foundation In Support of Appellee and Affirmance

Description: Criminal defendant, a postal worker, charged with illegally carrying a firearm in a post office. Our amicus brief argued that there is no historical tradition supporting banning firearm carry in post offices, and the district court ruling in Ayala’s favor should be affirmed.

 

Case Name: Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Dean F. Donnell, Jr.

Case Number: SJC-13561

Court: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Date Filed: 7/30/2024

Document Description: Amicus Brief of California Rifle & Pistol Association, Second Amendment Law Center, Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners of California, Gun Owners Foundation, Operation Blazing Sword-Pink Pistols, Second Amendment Defense and Education Coalition, and Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois in Support of Defendant-Appellee and Affirmance

Description: Donnell, a New Hampshire resident, was charged with carrying in Massachusetts without a permit issued by that state. Our amicus brief argued that there is no historical tradition of forcing visitors from other states to seek permission before exercising their right to carry.

 

Case Name: United States of America v. Allam

Case Number: 24-40065

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Date Filed: 7/19/2024

Document Description: Brief of Amici Curiae Second Amendment Law Center, Inc., California Rifle & Pistol Association, and Second Amendment Foundation in Support of Appellant and Reversal

Description: Allam was arrested while living out of his van while possessing a firearm, because he was parked near a school. Our amicus brief argued that the Gun Free School Zones Act is facially unconstitutional due to the lack of historical tradition of barring carry in large zones around a place, even if that place is deemed sensitive.

 

Case Name: Nguyen v. Bonta

Case Number: 24-2036

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Date Filed: 6/4/2024

Document Description: Amicus Brief of California Rifle & Pistol Association, Second Amendment Law Center, and Operation Blazing Sword-Pink Pistols in Support of Appellees and Affirmance

Description: Challenge to California’s limit of purchasing one firearm every 30 days. Our amicus brief argued that the State should be held to the “distinctly similar” standard, and that there is no history to support limiting firearm purchases in this way.

 

Case Name: United States v. Kittson

Case Number: 23-4132

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Date Filed: 5/17/2024

Document Description: Amicus Brief of California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated, Second Amendment Law Center, Inc., and The Second Amendment Foundation in Support of Neither Party and Reversal or Remand

Description: Criminal case concerning machine gun possession. Our amicus brief argued in favor of neither party, instead focusing on the fact that the district court improperly skipped the Bruen analysis altogether. Whatever the history, machine guns are at least “arms” under the Second Amendment, so a full historical analysis is required.

 

Case Name: Antonyuk v. James

Case Number: 23-910

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Filed: 3/25/2024

Document Description: Amicus Brief of Second Amendment Law Center, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., Gun Owners of California, Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, Second Amendment Defense and Education Coalition, and Operation Blazing Sword-Pink Pistols in Support of Petitioners

Description: This was an amicus brief in support of a cert petition by challengers to New York’s expansive “sensitive places” laws. The Supreme Court ultimately remanded the case following its decision in Rahimi.

 

Case Name: Garland v. Cargill

Case Number: 23-976

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Filed: 1/26/2024

Document Description: Amicus Brief of Second Amendment Law Center, Second Amendment Defense and Education Coalition, Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., and Guns Save Life in Support of Respondent and Affirmance

Description: This case concerned the bump stock ban. While it was not a Second Amendment challenge and instead concerned the Administrative Procedures Act and the scope of the ATF’s authority, our amicus brief reminded the Court of the implications for the Second Amendment if the ATF is allowed to so easily redefine what constitutes an illegal “machine gun”.

 

Case Name: Wolford v. Lopez

Case Number: 23-16164

Court: U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Date Filed: 11/9/2023

Document Description: Amicus Brief of Gun Owners of America, Inc., Second Amendment Law Center, Hawaii Rifle Association, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., Gun Owners of California, and Gun Owners Foundation in Support of Appellees

Description: This is a civil case challenging Hawaii’s expansive new “sensitive places” law that bans carry everywhere save for streets and sidewalks, as well as the few businesses willing to affirmatively allow carry. We explained how that law is unconstitutional and out of step with Bruen.

 

Case Name: Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland

Case Number: 23-1719

Court: U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Date Filed: 8/23/2023

Document Description: Amicus Brief of Second Amendment Law Center, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., Citizens' Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Second Amendment Defense and Education Coalition, Guns Save Life, Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners of California, and Gun Owners Foundation in Support of Appellants and Reversal

Description: This is a civil case challenging Montgomery County’s expansive new “sensitive places” law that bans carry in most public places. We explained how that law is unconstitutional and out of step with Bruen.

 

Case Name: Delaware State Sportsmen’s Association, Inc. v. Delaware Department of Homeland Security

Case Number: 23-1641

Court: U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Date Filed: 7/10/2023

Document Description: Amicus Brief of Gun Owners of America, Inc., Second Amendment Law Center, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., Gun Owners of California, Second Amendment Defense & Education Coalition, Guns Save Life, Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, & Gun Owners Foundation

Description: Challenge to Delaware “Assault Weapon” Ban. Our amicus brief argued that the district court wrongly held that the relevant historical tradition does not justify the State’s ban on common firearms and magazines.

 

Case Name: Barnett v. Raoul

Case Number: 23-209

Court: U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois

Date Filed: 4/5/2023

Document Description: Amicus Brief of Second Amendment Law Center

Description: Challenge to Illinois “Assault Weapon” Ban. Our amicus brief argued that the appropriate time period to determine original public understanding of the Second Amendment is 1791, when the bill of rights was adopted.

 

Case Name: Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. Rob Bonta

Case Number: 22-56090

Court: U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Date Filed: 12/27/2022

Document Description: Amicus Brief of the Second Amendment Law Center, Jews for the Preservation of Firearm Ownership, and Citizens' Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants

Description: Challenge to expansive California law banning advertising of firearms to minors, which had the effect of ending youth sports shooting programs (because they are possible through gun industry sponsorships). Our amicus brief explained how these restrictions violate the First Amendment.

 

Case Name: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen

Case Number: 20-843

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Filed: 7/20/2021

Document Description: Amicus Brief of California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated and Second Amendment Law Center, Inc. in Support of Petitioners

Description: This was the first major Second Amendment case in the Supreme Court since McDonald. Our amicus brief discussed the plight of the Second Amendment under the interest balancing test lower courts had been applying, particularly in the Ninth Circuit, where every gun law was upheld.

 

Case Name: Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. Grewal

Case Number: 20-1507

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Filed: 5/08/2021

Document Description: Amicus Brief of California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated, Gun Owners of California, and Second Amendment Law Center in Support of Petitioners

Description: Challenge to New Jersey ban on magazines over ten rounds, with challengers seeking Supreme Court review. Our amicus brief urged the Court to grant that review because the erosion of the Second Amendment in hostile Circuit Courts had gone on long enough. We invoked our own challenge to California’s similar law, Duncan v. Bonta.

 

Case Name: Caniglia v. Strom

Case Number: 20-157

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Filed: 1/14/2021

Document Description: Amicus Brief of Second Amendment Law Center, Inc., California Rifle & Pistol Association, and Gun Owners of California in Support of Petitioner

Description: This First Circuit case asked whether the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement extends to the home. Our amicus brief warned that applying the caretaking function to the home will be used as a pretext to conduct warrantless searches for firearms.